<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Alabama Genealogy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alabama-genealogy.net</link>
	<description>Alabama Genealogy and History resources, links, information and articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 17:32:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Happy Independence Day!</title>
		<link>http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/2011/07/04/happy-independence-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/2011/07/04/happy-independence-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 17:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alabama</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Site News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/?p=543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would like to wish all of you a Happy Independence Day. May you enjoy this day to reflect on the liberty that our forefathers (and foremothers) have fought to protect and pass down through the generations. I have posted a longer essay at my North Carolina Genealogy site with a deeper question: Where is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to wish all of you a Happy Independence Day.  May you enjoy this day to reflect on the liberty that our forefathers (and foremothers) have fought to protect and pass down through the generations.   I have posted a longer essay at my North Carolina Genealogy site with a deeper question:  <a href="http://www.northcarolinagenealogy.net/2011/07/04/where-is-the-4th-of-july/">Where is the 4th of July</a>.</p>
<img src="http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=543&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/2011/07/04/happy-independence-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alabama Genealogy Newsletter</title>
		<link>http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/2011/03/18/alabama-genealogy-newsletter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/2011/03/18/alabama-genealogy-newsletter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 16:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alabama</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Site News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/?p=538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is just an announcement to let you know that we have opened up registrations for the free Alabama Genealogy Newsletter. You can sign up either directly on our subscription page, or at one of the many forms you&#8217;ll find throughout the site. (There should be a signup form at the top and bottom of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just an announcement to let you know that we have opened up registrations for the free Alabama Genealogy Newsletter.  You can sign up either directly on our <a href="http://lists.alabama-genealogy.net/?p=subscribe&#038;id=1">subscription page</a>, or at one of the many forms you&#8217;ll find throughout the site.  (There should be a signup form at the top and bottom of the page when you click on the title of this post (or when you click to read more).)</p>
<p><span id="more-538"></span></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t expect this to be a high volume mailing list, perhaps there will be one to two messages a month.  It may be less frequent than that, possibly quarterly or a couple of issues a year.  It will all depend on whether I have something news-worthy about Alabama Genealogy and History to pass along to you.</p>
<p>The first newsletter won&#8217;t be until sometime later this year, so go ahead and sign up early so you don&#8217;t miss an issue!</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
<img src="http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=538&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/2011/03/18/alabama-genealogy-newsletter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Battle of Spanish Fort</title>
		<link>http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/2011/03/06/battle-of-spanish-fort/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/2011/03/06/battle-of-spanish-fort/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 02:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alabama</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Historical Reference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Civil War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spanish fort]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/?p=166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Battle of Spanish Fort took place from March 27 to April 8, 1865 in Baldwin County, Alabama, as part of the Mobile Campaign of the Western Theater of the American Civil War. After the Union victory in the Battle of Mobile Bay, Mobile nevertheless remained in Confederate hands. Spanish Fort was heavily fortified as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Battle of Spanish Fort took place from March 27 to April 8, 1865 in Baldwin County, Alabama, as part of the Mobile Campaign of the Western Theater of the American Civil War.</p>
<p>After the Union victory in the Battle of Mobile Bay, Mobile nevertheless remained in Confederate hands. Spanish Fort was heavily fortified as an eastern defense to the city of Mobile. Fort Huger, Fort (Battery) Tracey, Fort (Battery) McDermott, Fort Alexis, Red Fort, and Old Spanish Fort were all part of the Mobile defenses at Spanish Fort.</p>
<p><span id="more-166"></span><br />
</p>
<p>Union forces embarked on a land campaign in early 1865 to take Mobile from the east. Maj. Gen. E.R.S. Canby&#8217;s XIII and XVI corps moved along the eastern shore of Mobile Bay forcing the Confederates back into their defenses. Union forces then concentrated on Spanish Fort and Blakely Alabama. On March 27, 1865, Canby’s forces rendezvoused at Danley&#8217;s Ferry and immediately undertook a siege of Spanish Fort. The Union had enveloped the fort by April 1, and on April 8 captured it. Most of the Confederate forces, under the command of Brig. Gen. Randall L. Gibson, escaped and fled to Mobile, but Spanish Fort was no longer a threat.</p>
<p>With Spanish Fort&#8217;s fall on April 8 and Gen. Robert E. Lee&#8217;s surrender at Appomattox Court House the next day (unrelated to the fall of Spanish Fort, as Lee’s forces were in Virginia), Fort Blakely remained the last organized resistance to the Union east of the Mississippi River. However, as early as April 1, when Spanish Fort&#8217;s fall became inevitable, Union forces had begun moving north in order to concentrate on Fort Blakely, which eventually succumbed late on April 9 in the Battle of Fort Blakely.</p>
<p>The falls of Spanish Fort and Fort Blakely permitted Union troops to subsequently enter Mobile unopposed after the conclusion of the Civil War.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Spanish_Fort">Wikipedia</a>.</p>
<img src="http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=166&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/2011/03/06/battle-of-spanish-fort/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Battle of Selma</title>
		<link>http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/2011/02/20/battle-of-selma/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/2011/02/20/battle-of-selma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2011 02:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alabama</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Historical Reference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Civil War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battle of selma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[selma]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/?p=164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Battle of Selma was a military engagement near the end of the American Civil War. It was fought in Selma, Alabama, on April 2, 1865. Union Army forces under Major General James H. Wilson defeated a smaller Confederate Army force under Lieutenant General Nathan Bedford Forrest. On March 22, 1865, Wilson led three divisions [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Battle of Selma was a military engagement near the end of the American Civil War. It was fought in Selma, Alabama, on April 2, 1865. Union Army forces under Major General James H. Wilson defeated a smaller Confederate Army force under Lieutenant General Nathan Bedford Forrest.</p>
<p><span id="more-164"></span><br />
</p>
<p>On March 22, 1865, Wilson led three divisions of Union cavalry, totalling 13,500 men, on a raid from Gravelly Springs, deep into largely untouched southern Alabama. He was opposed by Confederate General Forrest, whose soldiers numbered only 2,000, and half of these were old men and boys. Wilson met and defeated Forrest in a running battle on April 1, 1865, at Ebenezer Church. Continuing towards Selma, Wilson divided his command into three columns. Although Selma&#8217;s defenses were strong, there were not enough Confederates to man them effectively. Wilson&#8217;s columns broke through the defenses at separate points, forcing the Confederates to surrender the city. Many of the officers and men, including Forrest and Lt. Gen. Richard Taylor, escaped before the surrender. Selma demonstrated that even Forrest, who had been considered almost invincible, could not stop the overpowering unrelenting Union moves into what still remained of the Confederacy.</p>
<p>Background to battle</p>
<p>On March 30, 1865, General Wilson detached Brig. Gen. John T. Croxton&#8217;s brigade to destroy all Confederate property at Tuscaloosa, Alabama. After capturing a Confederate courier who carried dispatches from Forrest describing the strength and disposition of his scattered forces, Wilson sent a brigade to destroy the bridge across the Cahaba River at Centreville. This effectively cut off Forrest from reinforcement. It also began a running fight that did not end until after the fall of Selma.</p>
<p>On the afternoon of April 1, following skirmishing in the morning, Wilson&#8217;s advanced guard ran into Forrest&#8217;s line of battle at Ebenezer Church, where the Randolph Road intersected the main Selma road. Forrest had hoped to bring his entire force to bear on Wilson. However, because of delays caused by flooding, plus earlier contacts with the enemy, Forrest could only muster less than 2,000 men, many of whom were not veterans but poorly trained militia consisting of old men and young boys.</p>
<p>The outnumbered Confederates fought bravely for over an hour, as Wilson deployed more Union cavalry and artillery on the field. Forrest himself was wounded by a saber-wielding Union captain, whom he killed with his revolver. Finally, a Union cavalry charge broke the Confederate militia, causing Forrest to be flanked on his right. He was forced to retreat under severe pressure.<br />
Struggle for Selma</p>
<p>Early the next morning Forrest arrived at Selma, &#8220;horse and rider covered in blood.&#8221; He advised Gen. Richard Taylor, departmental commander, to leave the city. Taylor did so after giving Forrest command of the defense.</p>
<p>Selma was protected by three miles of fortifications, which ran in a semicircle around the city. They were anchored on the north and south by the Alabama River. The works had been built two years earlier and, while neglected since then, they were still formidable. The defenses were from 8 to 12 feet high, 15 feet thick at the base, and had a ditch 4 feet wide and 5 feet deep along the front. Before this was a picket fence of heavy posts planted in the ground, 5 feet high, and sharpened at the top. At prominent positions, earthen forts were built with artillery in position to cover the ground over which an assault would have to be made.</p>
<p>Forrest&#8217;s defenders consisted of his Tennessee escort company, McCullough&#8217;s Missouri Regiment, Edward Crossland&#8217;s Kentucky Brigade, Phillip Dale Roddey&#8217;s Alabama Brigade, Frank Armstrong&#8217;s Mississippi Brigade, General Daniel W. Adams&#8217; state reserves, and citizens of Selma who volunteered to man the defenses. The total force numbered less than 4,000, barely half of whom were soldiers. Selma&#8217;s fortifications had been designed to be defended by 20,000 men, and Forrest&#8217;s outnumbered defenders had to stand 10 to 12 feet apart to cover their sectors.</p>
<p>Wilson&#8217;s force arrived at the Selma fortifications at 2 p.m. He placed Gen. Eli Long&#8217;s division across the Summerfield Road, with the Chicago Board of Trade Battery in support. Maj. Gen. Emory Upton&#8217;s division was placed across the Range Line Road with Battery I, 4th U.S. Artillery in support. Wilson had 9,000 well armed and well trained troops available to make the assault.</p>
<p>Wilson&#8217;s plan was for Upton to send in a 300-man detachment after dark to cross the swamp on the Confederate right, enter the works, and begin a flanking movement toward the center moving along the line of fortifications. Then a single gun from Upton&#8217;s artillery would fire the signal for an attack by the entire Federal Corps.</p>
<p>At 5 p.m., however, the ammunition train in Wilson&#8217;s rear was attacked by advance elements of Forrest&#8217;s scattered forces who were moving toward Selma. Long and Upton had both positioned significant numbers of the troops in their rear to guard against such an event. However, Long decided on his own to began an assault against the Selma fortifications to neutralize the attack in his rear.</p>
<p>Long&#8217;s men attacked in a single rank in three main lines, dismounted and firing their 7-shot Spencer repeating carbines. They were supported by their own artillery. The Confederates defenders replied with heavy small arms and artillery fire. In one of the many ironies of the Civil War, the Confederate artillery had only solid shot on hand, while just a short distance away was an arsenal which produced tons of canister, a highly effective anti-personnel ammunition.</p>
<p>The attackers suffered many casualties, including General Long himself, but the attack continued. Once the Union troops reached the works, vicious hand-to-hand fighting broke out. Many on both sides were struck down with clubbed muskets. Still, Union troops kept pouring into the works. In less than 30 minutes, Long&#8217;s men had captured the works protecting the Summerfield Road from the hopelessly outnumbered defenders.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, General Upton, observing Long&#8217;s success, ordered his own division forward. Soon, U.S. flags could be seen waving over the works from Range Line Road to Summerfield Road.</p>
<p>Once the outer works had fallen, General Wilson himself led the 4th U.S. Cavalry Regiment in a mounted charge down the Range Line Road toward the unfinished inner line of works. The retreating Confederate forces, having reached the inner works, rallied and poured a devastating fire into the charging Union column. This stopped the charge, and sent General Wilson sprawling to the ground when his favorite horse was wounded. Wilson quickly remounted his injured horse and ordered a dismounted assault by several regiments.</p>
<p>Mixed units of Confederate troops at the Selma railroad depot and the adjoining banks of the railroad bed tried to make a stand next to the Plantersville Road (present day Broad Street). Fighting there was heavy, but by 7 p.m. the superior numbers of Union troops had allowed them to flank the Southern positions, causing the defenders to abandon the depot as well as the inner line of works.</p>
<p>Union troops rounded up hundreds of prisoners, but hundreds more escaped in the darkness down the Burnsville Road. These included Generals Forrest, Armstrong, and Roddey. To the west, many Confederate soldiers continued to fight the pursuing Union soldiers all the way to the eastern side of Valley Creek. They then escaped in the darkness by swimming the Alabama River near the mouth of Valley Creek (where the present day Battle of Selma Reenactment is held.)</p>
<p>Jubilant Union troops looted the city that night, and many businesses and private residences were burned. Wilson&#8217;s men spent the next week destroying the arsenal and naval foundry. Finally, they left Selma and moved on to Montgomery and fought the Battle of Columbus, Georgia on Easter Sunday, and finally marched to Macon, Georgia, when they learned of the war&#8217;s end. On May 10, they captured Jefferson Davis in Irwinsville, Georgia.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Selma">Wikipedia</a>.</p>
<img src="http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=164&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/2011/02/20/battle-of-selma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Battle of Mobile Bay</title>
		<link>http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/2011/02/06/battle-of-mobile-bay/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/2011/02/06/battle-of-mobile-bay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 02:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alabama</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Historical Reference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Civil War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battle of mobile bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile bay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/?p=162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Battle of Mobile Bay of August 5, 1864, was an engagement of the American Civil War in which a Federal fleet commanded by Rear Adm. David G. Farragut, assisted by a contingent of soldiers, attacked a smaller Confederate fleet led by Adm. Franklin Buchanan and three forts that guarded the entrance to Mobile Bay [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Battle of Mobile Bay of August 5, 1864, was an engagement of the American Civil War in which a Federal fleet commanded by Rear Adm. David G. Farragut, assisted by a contingent of soldiers, attacked a smaller Confederate fleet led by Adm. Franklin Buchanan and three forts that guarded the entrance to Mobile Bay</p>
<p>The battle was marked by Farragut&#8217;s seemingly rash but successful run through a minefield that had just claimed one of his ironclad monitors, enabling his fleet to get beyond the range of the shore-based guns. This was followed by a reduction of the Confederate fleet to a single vessel, ironclad CSS Tennessee. Tennessee did not then retire, but engaged the entire Northern fleet. The armor on Tennessee gave her an advantage that enabled her to inflict more injury than she received, but she could not overcome the imbalance in numbers</p>
<p><span id="more-162"></span><br />
</p>
<p>She was eventually reduced to a motionless hulk, unable either to move or to reply to the guns of the Union fleet. Her captain then surrendered, ending the battle. With no Navy to support them, the three forts within days also surrendered. Complete control of the lower Mobile Bay thus passed to the Union forces.</p>
<p>Mobile had been the last important port on the Gulf of Mexico east of the Mississippi River remaining in Confederate possession, so its closure was the final step in completing the blockade in that region.</p>
<p>This Union victory, together with the capture of Atlanta, was a significant boost for Abraham Lincoln&#8217;s bid for re-election.</p>
<p>Mobile is situated near the head of Mobile Bay, a natural harbor formed where the Mobile and Tensaw rivers meet before they enter the Gulf of Mexico. The bay is about 33 mi (53 km) long; the lower bay is about 23 mi (37 km) at its greatest width. It is deep enough to accommodate ocean-going vessels in the lower half without dredging; above the mouth of Dog River the water becomes shoal, so deep-draft vessels could not approach the city.</p>
<p>The mouth of the bay is marked on the east by a long narrow peninsula of sand, Mobile Point, that separates Bon Secour Bay, where the Bon Secour River enters the larger bay, from the gulf. The land ends at the main channel into Mobile Bay, and here the United States (U.S.) government had erected a fort in more peaceful times to shield Mobile from possible enemy fleets.</p>
<p>Across the entrance, the line of the peninsula is continued in a series of barrier islands, beginning with Dauphin Island. Northwest of Dauphin Island is Little Dauphin Island, then a series of minor islands that are interrupted by a secondary entrance to the bay, Grant&#8217;s Pass. A few other small islands and shoals lie to the south of Dauphin Island, defining the main channel for as much as 10 mi (16 km) south of the entrance.</p>
<p>Rather early in the war, the Confederate government decided not to defend its entire coast, but to concentrate its efforts on a few of its most important ports and harbors. Following the loss of New Orleans in April 1862, Mobile was the only major port on the eastern gulf that would be defended.</p>
<p>The city subsequently became the center for blockade running on the gulf. Most of the trade between the Confederacy and Havana and other Caribbean ports passed through Mobile. A few attempts were mounted to break the blockade, but they were not large enough to have lasting impact. Among the most embarrassing episodes of the war for the U.S. Navy was the passage of the raider CSS Florida through the blockade into Mobile Bay on September 4, 1862; this was followed by her later escape through the same blockade on January 15, 1863.</p>
<p>Although the orders given to Flag Officer David G. Farragut when he was assigned to command of the West Gulf Blockading Squadron had included instructions to capture Mobile as well as New Orleans, the early diversion of the squadron into the campaign for the lower Mississippi meant that the city and its harbor would not receive full attention until after the fall of Vicksburg in July 1863.</p>
<p>Given respite by the Union strategy, the Confederate Army improved the defenses of Mobile Bay by strengthening Fort Morgan, (the work at the entrance mentioned above). In addition, they set up two smaller forts: Fort Gaines on Dauphin Island, across the main channel opposite Fort Morgan, and Fort Powell, a smaller work that guarded the Grant&#8217;s Pass channel. Grant&#8217;s Pass was also obstructed by a set of piles and other impediments, which had the effect of diverting the tidal flow to Heron Pass.</p>
<p>Land</p>
<p>Mobile and Mobile Bay were within the Department of Alabama, Mississippi and East Louisiana, led by Maj. Gen. Dabney H. Maury. Although Mobile was site of department headquarters, Maury did not exercise immediate command of the forts at the entrance to the bay, and he was not present during the battle and ensuing siege. Local command was entrusted to Brig. Gen. Richard L. Page.</p>
<p>The primary contribution of the Confederate Army to the defense of Mobile Bay was the three forts. Fort Morgan was a masonry structure dating from 1834. The fort mounted 46 guns, of which 11 were rifled. Its garrison numbered about 600.</p>
<p>Across the main channel from Fort Morgan on Dauphin Island was Fort Gaines, containing 26 guns, and with a garrison of about 600. When Page was not present, command of the fort fell to Col. Charles D. Anderson.</p>
<p>At the western end of the bay was Fort Powell, smallest of the three with 18 guns and about 140 men. It was commanded in Page&#8217;s absence by Lt. Col. James M. Williams. All three forts were flawed in that their guns were unprotected against fire from the rear; in addition, forts Powell and Gaines lacked adequate traverses.</p>
<p>The raw numbers of troops available do not indicate how effectively they would fight. The war was already winding down, and assertions were made that the morale of the soldiers was bad. The judgment is hard to quantify, but it would explain at least in part the poor performance of the defenders.</p>
<p>The Confederate Torpedo Bureau, directed by Maj. Gen. Gabriel J. Rains, contributed a passive weapon to the defense. Men of the bureau had planted 67 &#8220;torpedoes&#8221; (naval mines) across the entrance, leaving a gap on the eastern side of the channel so blockade runners and other friendly vessels could enter or leave the harbor. The minefield was well marked by buoys, which Farragut knew well. Its purpose was not necessarily to sink enemy vessels trying to enter, but rather to force them to steer close to Fort Morgan and its guns.</p>
<p>Water</p>
<p>The Confederate Navy likewise used the time they were given to improve the defense. Three small sidewheel gunboats of traditional type were stationed in the bay: CSS Selma, carrying four guns; Morgan, with six guns; and Gaines, also with six guns. In addition to these was the ironclad ram Tennessee, which, though carrying only six guns, was a far more impressive fighting machine by virtue of her armor.</p>
<p>Tennessee had been built on the Alabama River near the town of Selma. Her guns were prepared under the direction of Commander Catesby ap Roger Jones, the man who had commanded CSS Virginia (ex-USS Merrimack) in her famous duel with USS Monitor on March 9, 1862. On the first day of that battle, Virginia had been led by Flag Officer Franklin Buchanan, before he was wounded. Buchanan had been promoted to the rank of admiral for his exploits that day, the first admiral in the Confederacy. Adm. Buchanan now appeared in Mobile, to lead the small flotilla.</p>
<p>Launched before her machinery and guns were in place, Tennessee was towed down to Mobile Bay for completion. Once that was done she had to cross the Dog River Bar to get into the lower bay. Tennessee drew 13 ft (4.0 m), but the bar had only 9 ft (2.7 m) of water at high tide. To get her across, workers had to build a set of caissons, called &#8220;camels&#8221; by shipbuilders. These were fitted to her sides and pumped out, and barely lifted the ship enough to clear the bar. On May 18, 1864, she finally entered the lower bay.</p>
<p>Tennessee was the only armored vessel that the Confederate Navy put into lower Mobile Bay, but there were plans for others. Buchanan hoped that he would have as many as eight, including a pair of floating batteries, with which he could challenge the Union blockade, attack Pensacola and perhaps even recapture New Orleans. The manufacturing and transportation facilities of the South were not capable of this ambitious program, however. Some of the projected fleet were completed in time to defend Mobile after the lower bay had been lost, but they were not there when most needed. Nevertheless, they imparted some urgency to Farragut&#8217;s plans to maintain the blockade.</p>
<p>Union Navy</p>
<p>The man who led the Union fleet at Mobile Bay was Rear Adm. David G. Farragut, no longer Flag Officer Farragut. The U.S. Navy had undergone an organizational change in the second year of the war, one feature of which was the creation of the rank of rear admiral. The new rank implied that the ships of the navy would be employed as members of a fleet, not simply as collections of vessels with a common purpose.</p>
<p>The ships that made up his attacking fleet were of several distinct types, including some that had not even existed when the war began. Of the 18 vessels selected, eight were conventional wooden-hulled ships carrying large numbers of guns that fired broadside. Four of these (flagship Hartford, Brooklyn, Richmond and Oneida) had been with the West Gulf Blockading Squadron from the start, and had fought in its battles on the Mississippi. Two smaller gunboats, Kennebec and Itasca, had likewise been with Farragut since the capture of New Orleans.</p>
<p>One, Galena, was now very much like the others, but she had begun life as an experimental ironclad. Her armor had been found to be more hindrance than help, so it was removed. Three (Octorara, Metacomet and Port Royal) were double-enders, a type of warship that had been developed during the war to navigate the tortuous channels of the interior rivers. Finally, four were representatives of the New Navy — ironclad monitors. Two of these, Manhattan and Tecumseh, were improved versions of the original Monitor, featuring two large guns in a single turret. The other two, Chickasaw and Winnebago, were twin-turreted river monitors of light draft; each mounted four guns that were smaller than those carried by the other two.<br />
Union Army</p>
<p>Army cooperation was needed to take and hold the enemy forts. The man in command of the Military Division of West Mississippi, and as such the man whom Farragut would have to work with in planning the attack on Mobile, was Maj. Gen. Edward Richard Sprigg Canby, a career soldier. He calculated that 5,000 soldiers could be taken from other responsibilities in the division, enough to effect a landing behind Fort Morgan and cut it off from communication with Mobile. Their plans were undercut, however, when General-in-Chief Ulysses S. Grant made an urgent call for troops to be sent to the Virginia theater, then entering its critical phase.</p>
<p>Canby then believed that he could spare no more than 2,000, not enough to invest the largest fort, but enough to take Dauphin Island and thereby secure contact between the fleet inside the bay and their support in the gulf. Canby and Farragut recognized that they would not be able to threaten Mobile, but possession of the lower bay would be of great enough use to the blockading fleet that the projected attack should not be canceled.</p>
<p>Because communication between the fleet and the landing force would be needed, Canby suggested that a contingent of his signal corpsmen be distributed among the major ships of Farragut&#8217;s attacking force. Farragut accepted the offer. This almost casual mingling of the services would be found quite useful during the battle.</p>
<p>The army landing force, under Maj. Gen. Gordon Granger, was ready to launch the attack on August 3, but Farragut wanted to await the arrival of the fourth of his monitors, USS Tecumseh, expected almost momentarily but delayed at Pensacola. The admiral almost decided to proceed with only three monitors and the army, acting under a misapprehension of naval intentions, went ashore on Dauphin Island. The fleet was not ready to move yet, so the defenders were able to rush additional forces to Fort Gaines. After the battle, Farragut concluded that the delay had actually worked to the advantage of the Federal forces, as the reinforcements were not great enough to have any effect on the battle, but they were included in the surrender.</p>
<p>While the army was going ashore, Tecumseh made her belated appearance and Farragut made his final dispositions for the fleet. The 14 wooden-hulled vessels would be lashed together in pairs, in a reprise of a tactic that the admiral had used earlier at Port Hudson, Louisiana. The intent was that, if a ship were to be disabled by battle damage to her engines, her partner would be able to keep her moving.</p>
<p>The monitors would form a column and lead the way into the bay, moving in close to Fort Morgan, on the right side of the channel as they went in. The other ships would form a separate double column and pass on the port side of the monitors, so the armored ships would shield their wooden sisters from the guns of the fort. When the Confederate fleet made its expected appearance, the monitors would move to attack the armored CSS Tennessee, while the rest of the fleet would fight the faster gunboats.<br />
Passing the forts</p>
<p>At dawn on August 5, conditions were nearly ideal for the attack. The tide was running in, so Farragut had his ships reduce steam pressure in order to minimize damage if their boilers were to be hit; he relied on the current to give them speed. The southwest breeze that sprang up would carry smoke from the guns away from the fleet, and into the faces of the artillerymen in Fort Morgan. With Tecumseh, Manhattan, Winnebago and Chickasaw in order leading the way, the fleet approached the fort.</p>
<p>The second column was led by USS Brooklyn, lashed to Octorara. Brooklyn had the lead because she carried four chase guns that could fire forward, while the other large ships had only two. She was also fitted with a device for removing mines, referred to as a &#8220;cowcatcher&#8221; by Farragut in his reports. Following were Hartford and Metacomet, Richmond and Port Royal, Lackawanna and Seminole, Monongahela and Kennebec, Ossipee and Itasca, and Oneida and Galena.</p>
<p>The Confederate ships were ready for the attack, and they moved into position to intercept the Union fleet just beyond the minefield. At 6:47 a.m. Tecumseh fired the first shot, the forts replied and the action became general. The ships in the second column, excepting Brooklyn, could not reply to the guns of the Confederate vessels, so they had to concentrate on the fort. Perhaps because the fire from the fort was suppressed, most of the damage done to the Federal fleet was caused by the enemy ships.</p>
<p>Shortly after the start of the action, monitor Tecumseh moved past the fort and toward Tennessee, apparently in obedience to that part of her orders. Commander Tunis A. M. Craven either disregarded or forgot the instruction to stay to the east of the minefield, so he took his ship directly across. Almost immediately a torpedo went off under her hull, and she filled with water and sank in two or three minutes. Only 21 of her crew of 114 were saved. Craven was among those lost, so he could not explain his decisions.</p>
<p>Cap. James Alden of Brooklyn was apparently confused by conflicting orders, to stay on the port side of the monitors and to stay to the right of the minefield, so he stopped his ship and signaled Farragut for instructions. Farragut would not stop the flagship; he ordered Cap. Percival Drayton to send Hartford around Brooklyn and into the lead of the column. This took the ship into the torpedoes that had just sunk Tecumseh, but Farragut was confident that most of them had been submerged too long to be effective. His seeming gamble paid off, and the entire column of 14 warships passed through unharmed.</p>
<p>As they passed by Tennessee, Adm. Buchanan would have rammed some of the Federal vessels, but his ship was too slow. Disregarding Tennessee, Farragut ordered some of his small, fast gunboats to take care of the three Confederate gunboats. Metacomet, unleashed from Hartford, captured Selma. Fire from the gunboats holed Gaines, and she would have sunk had she not been beached; she was then burned by her crew. Morgan put up no resistance, but fled to the protection of the guns of Fort Morgan; next night she crept through the anchored Union fleet and escaped to Mobile.<br />
Clash with CSS Tennessee</p>
<p>Farragut expected Tennessee to take shelter under the guns of Fort Morgan while he rested his ships and assessed battle damage in the middle of the bay, but Buchanan instead decided to take on the entire Federal fleet single-handed. Possibly he hoped to repeat the ramming tactics that had been so successful at Hampton Roads two years earlier; Buchanan did not explain his reasoning.</p>
<p>This time the ships he was facing were in motion, and he had to contend with three monitors, not one. Because Tennessee was so slow she, rather than her opponents, became the target of ramming. Several of the Federal sloops managed to ram, including one, Monongahela, that had been fitted with an iron shield on her bow just for this purpose. None of the collisions harmed the ironclad; in every case, the ramming vessel suffered more.</p>
<p>While this was going on, the ships were exchanging shots. Again the Confederate ship was able to give more than she received, as the shot from Farragut&#8217;s wooden fleet bounced off the armor. The Union fleet suffered badly enough from Tennessee&#8217;s guns; it could have been worse, as many times the inferior powder in her guns failed to go off, causing them to misfire.</p>
<p>The balance was tilted finally when two monitors arrived. Tennessee was already almost motionless, her smokestack shot away and unable to build up boiler pressure. Her rudder chains were parted, so she could not steer. Furthermore, some of the shutters on her gun ports were jammed, rendering the guns behind them useless. Chickasaw took up position at her stern, and Manhattan began to pummel the ram with her 15 in (380 mm) guns. The heavy shot bent in the iron shield and shattered its oak backing.</p>
<p>Fragments killed or wounded some of the crew; one of the casualties was Adm. Buchanan himself, who suffered a badly broken leg. No longer able to fight, Commander James D. Johnston, captain of Tennessee, requested and received permission from the wounded admiral to surrender. A little more than three hours had elapsed since Tecumseh had fired the first shot.<br />
Forts Powell and Gaines</p>
<p>With the fleet no longer facing opposition from the Confederate Navy, Farragut could pay some attention to the forts. He dispatched monitor Chickasaw to throw a few shells at Fort Powell and then to assist the troops ashore at Fort Gaines. Although neither fort suffered significant casualties or damage, the bombardment was sufficient to reveal the vulnerability of each to fire from the rear.</p>
<p>At Fort Powell, Lt. Col. Williams asked for instructions from Brig. Gen. Page. Page responded with ambiguous orders that may have been justified when dealing with spirited troops, but were disastrous when issued to men as seemingly demoralized as those at Fort Powell: &#8220;When no longer tenable, save your garrison. Hold out as long as you can.&#8221; Williams was convinced that resistance was futile, so he had his guns spiked and his magazines blown up; then he and his garrison waded to the mainland and made their way to Mobile.</p>
<p>Col. Anderson at Fort Gaines held out longer, although he faced a more formidable foe. Maj. Gen. Granger&#8217;s soldiers vastly outnumbered his own, no matter whose figures for the garrison are accepted. The Federal troops could bring their artillery up to close range with impunity, being shielded behind the sand dunes of Dauphin Island. In position, they were able to take in reverse two guns that fired on Farragut&#8217;s fleet when it was entering the bay.</p>
<p>In the judgment of an engineering officer who inspected the fort after the Union army had taken possession, &#8220;It was utterly weak and inefficient against our attack (land and naval), which would have taken all its fronts in front, enfilade, and reverse.&#8221;Recognizing that his situation was hopeless, Anderson opened communication with Granger and Farragut under a flag of truce; ignoring orders from Page forbidding him to do so — and eventually removing him from command —, he surrendered the fort on August 8.<br />
Siege of Fort Morgan</p>
<p>As soon as the surrender of Fort Gaines was completed, Granger moved his force from Dauphin Island to the narrow strip of mainland behind Fort Morgan, where they were landed without opposition about 4 mi (6.4 km) away, well out of range of its guns. The fort was thus immediately invested, cut off from all communication with Mobile.</p>
<p>Granger set about taking the fort by regular approaches — that is, establishing a sequence of trenches or other protective lines drawn ever closer to the objective, until finally its walls could be breached and it could be taken by assault. His first line was a gift: a line of trenches that had been prepared by the garrison of the fort and then for some reason abandoned. At 1,400 yd (1,300 m) from the fort, it was a little farther than he would have liked, but it served quite well. Additional parallels were built with little interference, as the laborers could work behind the sand dunes.</p>
<p>While this was going on, the three monitors, Winnebago, Chickasaw, and Manhattan, were engaging in occasional bombardment. They were later joined by the former CSS Tennessee, captured on August 5, since repaired, and now renamed USS Tennessee. The most serious hindrance to the advance in this period was the weather; a storm on August 20 halted work for a while, and left standing water in low places. The fort was subjected to a day-long bombardment on August 22 from 16 siege mortars, 18 guns of various sizes and the fleet: the monitors and Tennessee at short range and the rest of the ships at long range.</p>
<p>Inside the fort, Brig. Gen. Page feared that the bombardment would endanger his magazines, which contained 80,000 lb (36,000 kg) of powder. To avoid the risk, he had the powder brought out and flooded. That night, the magazines were indeed threatened when the woodwork of the citadel caught fire. The fire brought an increase in the rate of bombardment, and was extinguished only with great effort.</p>
<p>Feeling now that further resistance was useless, on August 23 Page ordered his remaining guns spiked or otherwise destroyed as far as possible. At 6 am, he ordered the white flag raised, and the siege was over.<br />
Incidents of the battle<br />
Farragut lashed to the rigging</p>
<p>An anecdote of the battle that has some dramatic interest has it that Farragut was lashed to the mast during the passage of Fort Morgan. The image it brings to mind is of absolute resolve: if his ship were to be sunk in the battle, he would go down with her. The truth is more prosaic; while he was indeed lashed to the rigging of the mainmast, it was a precautionary move rather than an act of defiance. It came about after the battle had opened and smoke from the guns had clouded the air. In order to get a better view of the action, Farragut climbed into Hartford&#8217;s rigging, and soon was high enough that a fall would certainly incapacitate him and could have killed him. Seeing this, Cap. Drayton sent a seaman aloft with a piece of line to secure the admiral. He demurred, saying, &#8220;Never mind, I am all right,&#8221; but the sailor obeyed his captain&#8217;s orders, tying one end of the line to a forward shroud, then around the admiral and to the after shroud. </p>
<p>Later, when CSS Tennessee made her unsupported attack on the Federal fleet, Farragut climbed into the mizzen rigging. Still concerned for his safety, Cap. Drayton had Flag-Lt. J. Crittenden Watson tie him to the rigging again. Thus, the admiral had been tied to the rigging twice in the course of the battle.<br />
Damn the torpedoes</p>
<p>Most popular accounts of the battle relate that when Brooklyn slowed when Tecumseh crossed her path, Farragut asked why she was not moving ahead. When the reply came back that torpedoes were in her path, he is said to have said, &#8220;Damn the torpedoes.&#8221; The story did not appear in print until several years later, and some but not all historians ask whether it happened at all. Some forms of the story are highly unlikely; the most widespread is that he shouted to Brooklyn, &#8220;Damn the torpedoes! Go ahead!&#8221; Men present at the battle doubted that any such verbal communication could be heard above the din of the guns. More likely, if it happened, is that he said to the captain of Hartford, &#8220;Damn the torpedoes. Four bells, Captain Drayton.&#8221; Then he shouted to the commander of Metacomet, lashed to Hartford&#8217;s side, &#8220;Go ahead, Jouett, full speed.&#8221; The words have been altered in time to the more familiar, &#8220;Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead!&#8221;<br />
Army signals</p>
<p>Prior to the battle, army and navy used completely different signals. The navy used a cumbersome system of colored flags that would impart messages that had to be decoded, whereas the army was experimenting with a far simpler wigwag[54] system, recently developed by Col. Albert J. Myer. In order to communicate with army forces ashore after the fleet was safely inside Mobile Bay, several members of the fledgling Signal Corps were put on the major ships of Farragut&#8217;s fleet. They were expected to stay out of the way until they were needed; those on Hartford, for example, were assigned to assist the surgeon, so they were stationed below decks.</p>
<p>When Brooklyn encountered her difficulties with Tecumseh and the minefield Cap. Avery of Brooklyn wanted clarification of his orders more rapidly than could be done with navy signals, so he asked his army representatives to relay his question to the flagship. In order to read the message, the signal corpsmen on Hartford were brought up from below, and they stayed up through the rest of the fight. Their contribution was acknowledged by Farragut.<br />
Court martial of Brig. Gen. Page</p>
<p>After Fort Morgan was surrendered, the victors found that all of its guns had been spiked, gun carriages destroyed and other supplies destroyed. Some believed that much of the damage had been done while the white flag was flying, in violation of the rules of war as they were then understood. The belief was so strong that Maj. Gen. Canby made a formal accusation, and Page was tried in New Orleans by a three-man council of war to consider the charges. After reviewing the evidence, the court found him not guilty of the charges.<br />
Summing up</p>
<p>The Battle of Mobile Bay was not sanguinary by standards set by the armies of the Civil War, but it was by naval standards. It was only marginally, if at all, less bloody than the Battle of Forts Jackson and St. Philip and the Battle of Hampton Roads. The Federal fleet had lost 150 men killed and 170 wounded; on the Confederate ships, only 12 were dead and 19 wounded. Union Army losses were very light; in the siege of Fort Morgan, only one man was killed and seven wounded. Confederate losses, though not stated explicitly, seem to have been only slightly greater.</p>
<p>The continued presence of a Union Army force near Mobile constrained the Confederate Army in its last desperate campaigns. Maury realized that the numbers opposite him were inadequate for an attack, but the possibility of loss of Mobile would have been such a severe blow to the public mood that he would not send his guns or spare troops to support other missions.</p>
<p>This was particularly important to Maj. Gen. William T. Sherman, who was at that time engaged in the Atlanta campaign. Because Mobile remained unconquered the significance of Farragut&#8217;s victory initially had little effect on Northern public opinion. As time passed and a sequence of other Union victories seemed to show that the war was winding down, the battle began to loom larger.</p>
<p>When Atlanta fell, in the words of historian James M. McPherson, &#8220;In retrospect the victory at Mobile Bay suddenly took on new importance as the first blow of a lethal one-two punch.&#8221; The dispersal of Northern gloom assured Pres. Abraham Lincoln&#8217;s reelection in what was regarded as a referendum on continuation of the war.</p>
<p>With the capture of Fort Morgan, the campaign for the lower Mobile Bay was complete. Canby and Farragut had already decided before the first landings on Dauphin Island that the army could not provide enough men to attack Mobile itself; furthermore, the Dog River Bar that had impeded bringing CSS Tennessee down now prevented Farragut&#8217;s fleet from going up. Mobile did come under combined army-navy attack, but only in March and April 1865, after Farragut had been replaced by Rear Adm. Henry K. Thatcher. The city finally fell in the last days of the war.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Mobile_Bay">Wikipedia</a>.</p>
<img src="http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=162&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/2011/02/06/battle-of-mobile-bay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Battle of Fort Blakely</title>
		<link>http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/2011/01/20/battle-of-fort-blakely/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/2011/01/20/battle-of-fort-blakely/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 02:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alabama</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Historical Reference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Civil War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baldwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battle of fort blakely]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fort blakely]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/?p=160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Battle of Fort Blakely took place from April 2-April 9, 1865 in Baldwin County, Alabama, as part of the Mobile Campaign of the American Civil War. Maj. Gen. Edward Canby&#8217;s Union forces, the XVI and XIII Corps, moved along the eastern shore of Mobile Bay, forcing the Confederates back into their defenses. Union forces [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Battle of Fort Blakely took place from April 2-April 9, 1865 in Baldwin County, Alabama, as part of the Mobile Campaign of the American Civil War.</p>
<p>Maj. Gen. Edward Canby&#8217;s Union forces, the XVI and XIII Corps, moved along the eastern shore of Mobile Bay, forcing the Confederates back into their defenses. Union forces then concentrated on Spanish Fort, Alabama and nearby Fort Blakely. By April 1, Union forces had enveloped Spanish Fort, thereby releasing more troops to focus on Fort Blakely. Confederate Brig. Gen. St. John R. Liddell, with about 4,000 men, held out against the much larger Union force until Spanish Fort fell on April 8 in the Battle of Spanish Fort. </p>
<p><span id="more-160"></span><br />
</p>
<p>This allowed Canby to concentrate 16,000 men for the attack on April 9, led by Brig. Gen. John P. Hawkins. Sheer numbers breached the Confederate earthworks, compelling the Confederates, including Liddell, to surrender. The siege and capture of Fort Blakely was basically the last combined-force battle of the war. Yet, it is criticized by some (such as Ulysses S. Grant) as an ineffective contribution to Union war effort due to Canby&#8217;s lateness in engaging his troops. African-American forces played a major role in the successful Union assault.</p>
<p>The site of the battle is now a historical park, Historic Blakeley State Park.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Fort_Blakely">WIkipedia</a>.</p>
<img src="http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=160&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/2011/01/20/battle-of-fort-blakely/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Battle of Decatur</title>
		<link>http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/2011/01/06/battle-of-decatur/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/2011/01/06/battle-of-decatur/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 02:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alabama</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Historical Reference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Civil War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battle of decatur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decatur]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/?p=158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Battle of Decatur was a demonstration conducted from October 26 to October 29, 1864, as part of the Franklin-Nashville Campaign of the American Civil War. Union forces of 3–5,000 men under Brig. Gen. Robert S. Granger prevented the 39,000 men of the Confederate Army of Tennessee under Lt. Gen. John B. Hood from crossing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Battle of Decatur was a demonstration conducted from October 26 to October 29, 1864, as part of the Franklin-Nashville Campaign of the American Civil War. Union forces of 3–5,000 men under Brig. Gen. Robert S. Granger prevented the 39,000 men of the Confederate Army of Tennessee under Lt. Gen. John B. Hood from crossing the Tennessee River at Decatur, Alabama.</p>
<p><span id="more-158"></span><br />
</p>
<p>John Bell Hood was marching through northern Alabama on his way to an invasion of Tennessee. His army had departed northwest from the vicinity of Atlanta, Georgia, in late September 1864, hoping that their destruction of Union supply lines would lure Maj. Gen. William T. Sherman&#8217;s Union army into battle. Sherman pursued Hood as far as Gaylesville, Alabama, but decided to return his army to Atlanta and conduct instead a March to the Sea through Georgia. He gave responsibility for the defense of Tennessee to Maj. Gen. George H. Thomas.</p>
<p>Hood departed from Gadsden, Alabama, on October 22, en route to Guntersville, Alabama, where he planned to cross the Tennessee River. Learning that that crossing place was strongly guarded, and concerned that Federal gunboats could destroy any pontoon bridge he might deploy, he impulsively changed his destination to Decatur, 40 miles west.</p>
<p>When Hood arrived at Decatur on October 26, he found that a Federal infantry force of 3–5,000 men was defending an entrenched line that included two forts and 1,600 yards of rifle pits. Two Federal wooden gunboats patrolled the river. On October 27, Hood arranged his arriving army to encircle Decatur. On October 28, Confederate skirmishers advanced through a dense fog to a ravine within 800 yards of the main fortifications. Around noon, a small Federal detachment drove the sharpshooters and skirmishers out of the ravine, capturing 125 men. Hood, concluding that he could not afford the casualties that would ensue from a full-scale assault, withdrew his army. He decided once again to move to the west, to attempt another crossing near Tuscumbia, Alabama, where Muscle Shoals would prevent interference by Federal gunboats.</p>
<p>Union forces burned down the city of Decatur, including the railroad bridge, leaving several structures standing, four of which survive today: the Old State Bank, the Dancy-Polk House, the Todd House, and the McEntire House. Slugs can still be found in the masonry of the Greek Revival bank building.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Decatur">Wikipedia</a>.</p>
<img src="http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=158&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/2011/01/06/battle-of-decatur/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Battle of Day&#8217;s Gap</title>
		<link>http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/2010/12/20/battle-of-days-gap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/2010/12/20/battle-of-days-gap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 02:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alabama</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Historical Reference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Civil War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battle of days gap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[days gap]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/?p=156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Battle of Day&#8217;s Gap, fought on April 30, 1863, was the first in a series of American Civil War skirmishes in Cullman County, Alabama, that lasted until May 2, known as Streight&#8217;s Raid. Commanding the Union forces was Col. Abel Streight; Brig. Gen. Nathan Bedford Forrest led the Confederate forces. The goal of Streight&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Battle of Day&#8217;s Gap, fought on April 30, 1863, was the first in a series of American Civil War skirmishes in Cullman County, Alabama, that lasted until May 2, known as Streight&#8217;s Raid. Commanding the Union forces was Col. Abel Streight; Brig. Gen. Nathan Bedford Forrest led the Confederate forces.</p>
<p>The goal of Streight&#8217;s raid was to cut off the Western &#038; Atlantic Railroad, which supplied General Braxton Bragg&#8217;s Confederate army in Middle Tennessee. Starting in Nashville, Tennessee, Streight and his men first traveled to Eastport, Mississippi, and then eastward to Tuscumbia, Alabama. On April 26, 1863, Streight left Tuscumbia and marched southeastward. Streight&#8217;s initial movements were screened by Union Brig. Gen. Grenville Dodge&#8217;s troops.</p>
<p><span id="more-156"></span><br />
</p>
<p>On April 30 at Day&#8217;s Gap on Sand Mountain, Forrest caught up with Streight&#8217;s expedition and attacked his rear guard. Streight&#8217;s men managed to repulse this attack and as a result they continued their march to avoid any further delays and envelopments caused by the Confederate troops.</p>
<p>This battle set off a chain of skirmishes and engagements at Crooked Creek (April 30), Hog Mountain (April 30), Blountsville (May 1), Black Creek/Gadsden (May 2), and Blount&#8217;s Plantation (May 2). Finally, on May 3, Forrest surrounded Streight&#8217;s exhausted men three miles east of Cedar Bluff, Alabama, and forced their surrender. They were sent to Libby Prison in Richmond, Virginia. Streight and some of his men escaped on February 9, 1864.</p>
<p>Chronology of events of Streight&#8217;s Raid in 1863</p>
<p>    * Nashville, Tennessee (April 7-10) — proceeded by river<br />
    * Palmyra, Tennessee (April 11-13) — proceeded on foot<br />
    * Yellow Creek, Tennessee (April 13-14) — proceeded on foot<br />
    * Fort Henry, Tennessee (April 15-17) — proceeded by river<br />
    * Eastport, Mississippi (April 19-21) — proceeded either by foot or river<br />
    * Bear Creek/River, Mississippi (April 22) — proceeded on foot the rest of the way<br />
    * Tuscumbia, Alabama (April 24-26)<br />
    * Mount Hope, Alabama (April 27-28)<br />
    * Moulton, Alabama (April 28)<br />
    * Day&#8217;s Gap, Alabama (April 29-30)<br />
    * Battle of Day&#8217;s Gap (April 30)<br />
    * Skirmish at Crooked Creek (April 30)<br />
    * Skirmish at Hog Mountain (April 30)<br />
    * Arrival at Blountsville (May 1)<br />
    * Skirmishes at Blountsville (May 1)<br />
    * Skirmishes at the East Branch of the Black Warrior River (May 1)<br />
    * Skirmishes at the crossing of Black Creek, near Gadsden (May 2)<br />
    * Damaged ammunition while crossing Will&#8217;s Creek, near Gadsden (May 2)<br />
    * Gadsden, Alabama (May 2)<br />
    * Blount&#8217;s plantation, about 15 miles from Gadsden (May 2)<br />
    * Skirmishes at/near Blount&#8217;s Plantation, Cherokee County (May 2-3)<br />
    * Centre, Alabama (May 3)<br />
    * Cedar Bluff, Alabama (May 3)<br />
    * Surrender to Confederate General Nathan Bedford Forrest, 3 miles east of Cedar Bluff, Alabama (May 3)<br />
    * Taken to Richmond, Virginia, as prisoners of war</p>
<p>Union order of battle</p>
<p>The following regiments participated in Streight&#8217;s Raid:</p>
<p>    * 80th Illinois Infantry<br />
    * 51st Indiana Infantry<br />
    * 73rd Indiana Infantry<br />
    * 3rd Ohio Infantry<br />
    * 1st Middle Tennessee Cavalry (2 companies)</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Day%27s_Gap">Wikipedia</a>.</p>
<img src="http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=156&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/2010/12/20/battle-of-days-gap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Battle of Athens</title>
		<link>http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/2010/12/06/the-battle-of-athens/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/2010/12/06/the-battle-of-athens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 02:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alabama</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Historical Reference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Civil War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[athens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battle of athens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil war]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/?p=154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Battle of Athens was fought in Athens, Alabama (Limestone County, Alabama), on January 26, 1864, as part of the American Civil War. The Union force was a detachment under Captain Emil Adams from the 9th Illinois Mounted Infantry regiment. The Confederate force was the 1st Alabama Cavalry, under Lt. Col. Moses W. Hannon. On [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Battle of Athens was fought in Athens, Alabama (Limestone County, Alabama), on January 26, 1864, as part of the American Civil War. The Union force was a detachment under Captain Emil Adams from the 9th Illinois Mounted Infantry regiment. The Confederate force was the 1st Alabama Cavalry, under Lt. Col. Moses W. Hannon.</p>
<p><span id="more-154"></span><br />
</p>
<p>On the morning of January 26, 1864, at around 4:00 a.m., 600 Confederate cavalrymen attacked Athens, which was being held by a Union force of only 100. Even though the Union defenders had no fortifications and were outnumbered six to one, they were able to repulse the Confederate attack and force them into a retreat after a two-hour battle.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Athens_(1864)">Wikipedia</a>.</p>
<img src="http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=154&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/2010/12/06/the-battle-of-athens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alabama Congressional Delegation in the Confederate Congress</title>
		<link>http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/2010/11/20/alabama-congressional-delegation-in-the-confederate-congress/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/2010/11/20/alabama-congressional-delegation-in-the-confederate-congress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2010 05:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alabama</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Historical Reference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confederacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confederate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/?p=122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Deputies from the first seven states to secede formed the first two sessions of the 1861 Provisional Confederate Congress. Alabama sent William Parish Chilton, Sr., Jabez Lamar Monroe Curry, Thomas Fearn (resigned March 16, 1861, after first session; replaced by Nicholas Davis, Jr.), Stephen Fowler Hale, David Peter Lewis (resigned March 16, 1861, after first [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deputies from the first seven states to secede formed the first two sessions of the 1861 Provisional Confederate Congress. Alabama sent William Parish Chilton, Sr., Jabez Lamar Monroe Curry, Thomas Fearn (resigned March 16, 1861, after first session; replaced by Nicholas Davis, Jr.), Stephen Fowler Hale, David Peter Lewis (resigned March 16, 1861, after first session; replaced by Henry Cox Jones), Colin John McRae, John Gill Shorter (resigned November 1861; replaced by Cornelius Robinson), Robert Hardy Smith, and Richard Wilde Walker.</p>
<p>The bicameral First Confederate Congress (1862–64) included two senators from Alabama—Clement Claiborne Clay and William Lowndes Yancey (died July 23, 1863; replaced by Robert Jemison, Jr.). Representing Alabama in the House of Representatives were Thomas Jefferson Foster, William Russell Smith, John Perkins Ralls, Jabez Lamar Monroe Curry, Francis Strother Lyon, William Parish Chilton, Sr., David Clopton, James Lawrence Pugh, Edmund Strother Dargan</p>
<p>Alabama&#8217;s two senators in the Second Confederate Congress (1864–65) were Robert Jemison, Jr., and Richard Wilde Walker. Representatives were Thomas Jefferson Foster, William Russell Smith, Marcus Henderson Cruikshank, Francis Strother Lyon, William Parish Chilton, Sr., David Clopton, James L. Pugh, and James Shelton Dickinson. Congress refused to seat Representative-elect W. R. W. Cobb because he was an avowed Unionist; therefore his district was not represented.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alabama_in_the_American_Civil_War">Wikipedia</a></p>
<img src="http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=122&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alabama-genealogy.net/2010/11/20/alabama-congressional-delegation-in-the-confederate-congress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 803/927 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.alabama-genealogy.net @ 2012-05-18 18:43:15 -->
